Discover the new GPT-6 Astra Codex pricing policy. OpenAI now removes multiplier penalties for contexts exceeding 272K, offering flat rates up to 1M tokens.

Related Posts:

• Google Workspace Integrates Gemini Live Features
• Court Upholds Edge Gatekeeper Exemption
• Microsoft Defender Intercepts Legitimate Links

The post GPT-6 Astra Updates Codex Pricing appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.

Debian's AI policy vote picked "Responsible Use of Generative AI": AI is neither banned nor endorsed, with full accountability left to contributors.

Related Posts:

• Linux Nears USB4 Support for Apple Silicon
• California Exempts Linux from Age Verification
• Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS Released with Crucial Bug Fixes

The post Debian AI Policy: Responsible Generative AI Use Wins Vote appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.

ChatGPT for Teens adds stronger protections for users ages 13 to 17, but parents still face limits around monitoring, age prediction, and AI safety.

The post ChatGPT for Teens Adds New Safeguards — but Safety Gaps Remain appeared first on TechRepublic.

Meta must pay $567 million and change Facebook and Instagram protections for minors under a New Mexico court order it plans to appeal.

The post Meta Ordered to Pay $567M and Overhaul Teen Safety on Facebook, Instagram appeared first on TechRepublic.

Researchers found that seven of nine tested Hugging Face image-editing tools produced sexualized alterations, highlighting gaps in model oversight, provenance, and enterprise vendor controls.

The post Hugging Face Deepfake Tests Raise New Risks for AI Procurement appeared first on TechRepublic.

The outgoing executive director of the Office of Homeland Security Statistics is one of very few federal officials to speak out against the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

The AI Kill Switch Act would let DHS order developers to slow or shut down frontier models after catastrophic incidents, raising enterprise continuity concerns.

The post House Lawmakers Propose Mandatory Kill Switches for Frontier AI Systems appeared first on TechRepublic.

Australia’s under-16 social media ban faces scrutiny after testers found major platforms did not ask for age proof.

The post Australia’s Teen Social Media Ban Exposes Age Verification Gap appeared first on TechRepublic.

A June 2026 research review found that AI chatbot warning labels may be a weak safeguard for organization-backed AI advisors, raising new audit questions for IT, security, and compliance teams.

The post AI Chatbot Warnings May Not Stop Hallucinations, Researchers Say appeared first on TechRepublic.

See what you missed in Daily Tech Insider from June 29–July 2.

The post AI Oversight, Security Flaws, and Industry Shifts Define This Week in Tech appeared first on TechRepublic.

Five Eyes agencies warned that AI could speed cyberattacks within months, raising new risks around prompt injection, phishing, and enterprise AI tools.

The post Five Eyes Warns AI Could Speed Cyberattacks Within Months appeared first on TechRepublic.

Reliance’s AI roadmap puts Jio CallAgent inside the telecom network while tying India-scale AI ambitions to Jamnagar compute, local-language services, and enterprise compliance questions.

The post Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance AI Roadmap Puts Jio CallAgent Inside the Network appeared first on TechRepublic.

See what you missed in Daily Tech Insider from June 15–18.

The post AI Crackdowns, Mega Mergers, and Security Chaos Define This Week in Tech appeared first on TechRepublic.

The right-wing think tank is actively pushing “civil terrorism”—increasing penalties for minor crimes committed while people engage in constitutionally protected free speech.

France is already moving on from Zoom and Microsoft Teams in favor of homegrown alternatives. Other countries are quickly following suit.

David Norman, a former Phoenix police officer who’s described himself as “a fucking savage,” now runs a company that provided training to Homeland Security’s Special Response Teams.

In the US, fired and laid-off workers often have their digital credentials deactivated before they learn about the loss of their jobs; indeed, the inability to log in to a corporate system may be the first an employee knows of the situation.

Although not a generous or humane approach to staff reduction, it does follow from the simple fact that a fired employee with access to company systems is a security risk.

Just ask the Akhter twin brothers, accused of wiping out 96 databases hosting US government information in the minutes after both were fired last year from their shared employer.

Read full article

Comments

© Getty Images

Modern browser extensions and ad blockers are legally collecting and reselling user data, including streaming habits and B2B sales intelligence, under the guise of "analytics." This unregulated "legal spyware" creates massive security gaps as employees unwittingly leak corporate URLs, SaaS dashboards, and research activity to third-party databases. With the rise of AI-native browsers and personal device syncing, security leaders must evolve beyond simple permission checks to implement rigorous extension governance and privacy policy reviews to prevent targeted attacks and corporate data leakage.

The post Networks of Browser Extensions Are Spyware in Disguise  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

A US surveillance program that lets the FBI view Americans’ communications without a warrant is up for renewal. A new bill aims to address mounting lawmaker concerns—with smoke and mirrors.

A Live Facial Recognition Policy used by the Metropolitan Police Service has been upheld by the High Court of Justice, marking a significant legal development in the use of surveillance technology in the UK. The ruling, delivered on April 21, 2026, dismissed a legal challenge that questioned whether the policy allows excessive discretion in how facial recognition is deployed. The case, brought by civil liberties campaigners, focused on whether the Live Facial Recognition Policy complies with protections under the European Convention on Human Rights, particularly rights related to privacy, expression, and assembly.

Challenge to Live Facial Recognition Policy and Legal Grounds

The judicial review was filed by Shaun Thompson and Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch. The claimants argued that the Live Facial Recognition Policy gives police officers too much freedom to decide where and how the technology is used, potentially leading to arbitrary surveillance. Their case relied on Articles 8, 10, and 11 of the ECHR, which protect the right to privacy and freedom of expression and assembly. They argued that the policy lacked sufficient clarity and safeguards, making it incompatible with legal standards that require laws to be foreseeable and constrained. However, the court clarified that the case was not about whether facial recognition technology itself is appropriate, but whether the policy governing its use meets legal requirements.

Court Finds Safeguards and Structure in Live Facial Recognition Policy

In its judgment, the court ruled that the Live Facial Recognition Policy contains clear rules and does not grant unchecked powers to police officers. Judges highlighted that the policy limits deployment to three defined scenarios: crime hotspots, protective security operations, and cases involving specific intelligence about a suspect’s presence. The court noted that each deployment must undergo a proportionality assessment, ensuring that potential impacts on privacy and civil liberties are considered. It also emphasized that decisions are subject to oversight and follow a structured chain of command. According to the ruling, these safeguards distinguish the current policy from earlier concerns raised in previous cases. The judges concluded that the Live Facial Recognition Policy meets the legal requirement of being “in accordance with the law.”

Evidence and Concerns Around Misuse Rejected

The claimants pointed to concerns about wrongful identification and potential misuse of facial recognition technology. One claimant described being mistakenly stopped after being incorrectly matched to a suspect. Despite these concerns, the court found that much of the supporting evidence did not directly address the legality of the policy. Some submissions were dismissed as opinion rather than factual or expert evidence relevant to the legal issues being considered. The court also rejected arguments that the policy enables widespread surveillance in crowded areas. It clarified that deployment decisions are based on crime data and intelligence, not simply on the number of people in a location.

Discrimination Concerns and Broader Debate

Concerns about bias in facial recognition systems were raised during the proceedings, particularly following earlier findings by the National Physical Laboratory. However, the court stated that no substantial legal challenge on discrimination grounds had been properly presented. As a result, it did not find evidence that the Live Facial Recognition Policy is unlawful on those grounds. Separately, the UK government has signaled plans to expand the use of facial recognition technology. The Home Office has proposed increasing its deployment and is consulting on a stronger legal framework to support wider use.

Operational Impact and Future of Facial Recognition

The Metropolitan Police has defended the use of facial recognition, stating that the technology has supported thousands of arrests angd helped identify suspects in serious crimes, including violent and sexual offenses. Officials also highlighted improvements in accuracy and safeguards, including the immediate deletion of non-matching data and human review of alerts. Commissioner Mark Rowley described the ruling as a major step forward for public safety, emphasizing that the technology is carefully controlled and effective. With the court confirming that the Live Facial Recognition Policy meets legal standards, the decision is likely to influence how surveillance tools are used and regulated in the UK. It also sets a precedent for future legal challenges as governments and law enforcement agencies continue to expand the use of biometric technologies.